Construction Dispute Research: Conceptualisation, Avoidance by Sai On Cheung

By Sai On Cheung

There are 3 particular reasons of Construction Dispute examine. First, this quantity goals to summarise stories on building dispute. moment, except the theoretical constructs, the place acceptable empirical assessments also are incorporated. This technique serves to head past the generally used anecdotal method for the topic issues. 3rd, it's the honest wish of the authors that this booklet might help shaping study schedule of building dispute. The stories are quite often framed from a administration point of view drawing on tools and ideas in agreement legislation, economics, psychology and administration technology.

The booklet has twenty chapters which are prepared in 4 elements masking conceptualisation, avoidance, negotiation and mediation. half 1 is dedicated for dispute conceptualisation. A development is simply as robust as its origin. hence it really is no larger begin to examine development dispute via conceptualisation. The subject of half 2 is dispute avoidance. the traditional knowledge of ‘prevention is best than treatment’ turns out could be utilized to all difficulties. so far as development dispute is worried, equitable hazard allocation and belief are the 2 most typically approved avoidance options. half three makes a speciality of negotiation that's the gateway to solution as just about all disputes are negotiated first earlier than the provider of alternative mechanisms. Negotiation is typically defined as an paintings simply because payment will not be received completely from criminal and rational techniques. half three discusses the behavioral dimensions of building dispute negotiation. half four offers with Mediation- a sort of assisted negotiation. in particular, the ability of the mediators in facilitating cost, the interrelationships between dispute resources, mediator strategies and mediation results are explored.

The experiences provided in Construction Dispute Research jointly exhibit holistic process in dispute administration. each one bankruptcy will be learn as a examine by itself. Practitioners will locate the booklet a convenient reference in dispute administration and determination. scholars might locate the ebook necessary in explaining in information the motives of dispute, the methods to unravel them. The study layout and empirical ways are rather necessary to scholars in development administration, architectural, surveying and civil engineering programs.

Show description

Read Online or Download Construction Dispute Research: Conceptualisation, Avoidance and Resolution PDF

Best construction books

Extra info for Construction Dispute Research: Conceptualisation, Avoidance and Resolution

Example text

O. 1007/978-3-319-04429-3_3, Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 39 40 H. Y. Pang and S. O. Cheung people involved. In this study, the proposed anatomy of construction disputes links the inherent characteristics of construction project and people factors together. The occurrence likelihood of construction disputes can thereby be evaluated holistically. Diekmann and Girard (1995) and Molenaar et al. (2000) employed logistic regression and applied discrete choice modeling to develop dispute potential index.

McGuine & R. ), Decision and organization—A volume in honour of Jacob Marschak. North-Holland, Amsterdam. Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational decision-making in business organizations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513. Simon, H. A. ). (1997). Models of bounded rationality. Cambridge: MIT Press. , & Langford, V. (1994). Multivariate influences on the people side of projects: Stress and conflict. International Journal of Project Management, 12(4), 234–243. Spittler, J. , & Jentzen, G. H. (1992).

Actual happenings thus deviate from the game of perfect information presumed in a rational model; ‘‘Theories of bounded rationality are thus theories of decision making that assume that the decision maker wishes to attain goals, and uses his or her mind as well as possible to that end’’ (Simon 1997). Under the rational model, good administration is the up keeping efficiency for which scarce resources of an organisation shall be deployed to accomplish its objective through rational behaviour. Rationality is therefore concerned with the selection of preferred behaviour alternatives in terms of some system of values whereby the consequences of behaviour can be evaluated (Simon 1957).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.84 of 5 – based on 26 votes